🗣️

雅思口语

Part 2 独立陈述（Long Turn）

• 时长： 3–4分钟（含1分钟准备时间）

• 流程：
1. 考官会给你一张话题卡（Cue Card），上面列出要点。
2. 你有1分钟准备时间，可使用纸笔做笔记。
3. 然后你需连续说2分钟，考官在时间到时会打断你。
4. 最后可能会问1–2个与主题相关的简短问题。

💡 答题技巧：

• 利用一分钟准备时间写下关键点（如关键词、顺序、例子）

• 用笔记记录关键词，不要写完整句子。

• 在陈述中用 “First / Next / Finally” 或 “On one hand / On the other hand” 等连接词来梳理思路

• 若卡壳，可使用填充语（That’s an interesting question... / Let me think for a moment...）。

• 若时间快到，可用一句 “In conclusion…” 或 “To sum up…” 做简短总结

• 被打断或没说满 1–2 分钟时，也不用慌张，可简要延伸某一点或回答考官追问

Part 3 深入讨论（Discussion）

• 时长： 4–5分钟

• 内容： 考官会根据Part 2的话题，引申出更抽象或社会性的问题。

💡 答题技巧：

• 采用观点 + 解释 + 例子 (Point–Explain–Example, PEE) 的结构进行回答

• 回答时要尽量展开（不要只说一两句就停），但也要注意不要偏题

Part 2

1. data privacy 数据隐私

2. job displacement 工作岗位被取代；失业风险

3. human autonomy 人类自主性；自主决策能力

1. technical sophistication 技术上的高度复杂与先进性
sophistication noun the quality in a machine or system of being clever and complicated in the way that it works or is presented世故；复杂巧妙；高水平
• the increasing power and sophistication of computers 计算机的日益强大和复杂
• Financial markets have grown in sophistication as well as size. 金融市场的规模不断扩大，复杂程度也越来越高。

Part 3

1. Why do some children not like learning science subjects at school?
我的答案
One major reason is that science is often taught in a highly abstract and exam-oriented way. When students are asked to memorise formulas without understanding their real-world applications, the subject can feel both intimidating and irrelevant. As a result, curiosity is replaced by pressure.
1. teach in a highly abstract and exam-oriented way 以高度抽象且以考试为导向的方式教学
2. memorise formulas 死记公式
3. intimidating /ɪnˈtɪmɪdeɪtɪŋ/ 令人畏惧的；让人感到压力或害怕的
• Used to describe something that makes someone feel nervous, anxious, or incapable.
• 常用于教育、工作或新环境中，描述心理感受。

2. Should children be encouraged to learn science?
我的答案
Yes, but the emphasis should be on engagement rather than performance. If science is presented as a tool for understanding everyday phenomena rather than merely a test subject, children are far more likely to develop long-term interest and confidence.
1. engagement 参与度；投入程度
2. a test subject 应试科目
3. develop long-term interest and confidence 培养长期的兴趣与自信

3. Should people be encouraged to learn science after graduation?
我的答案
Absolutely. In a society increasingly shaped by technology, basic scientific literacy is essential for informed decision-making. Even non-specialists benefit from understanding topics like data security, public health, or climate change.
1. basic scientific literacy 基本科学素养
literacy noun /ˈlɪtərəsi/ [uncountable]
1. the ability to read and write 读写能力
• basic literacy skills 基本的读写技巧
2. (in compounds构成复合词) knowledge or skills in a specific area 特定领域的知识或技能
• financial/health literacy 金融/健康知识
see also computer literacy
computer literacy noun /kəmˌpjuːtə ˈlɪtərəsi/ [uncountable] the ability to use computers well 能熟练使用计算机的；会用电脑的
• Low levels of computer literacy in any organization are a disaster. 任何组织的计算机知识水平低都是一场灾难。
2. informed decision-making 基于充分信息的决策
3. data security 数据安全
4. public health 公共卫生

4. How do you get to know about scientific news?
我的答案
I mainly rely on reputable science journalism platforms and long-form articles rather than social media. This allows me to understand not only the findings themselves, but also the context and limitations of the research.
1. reputable science journalism platforms 有信誉的科学新闻平台
2. long-form articles 长篇文章

5. Should scientists explain the research process to the public?
我的答案
Definitely. Transparency helps build public trust and prevents misinformation. When people understand how conclusions are reached, they are less likely to misinterpret or oversimplify scientific results.
版本2：I think that, in general, transparency in research and communication can help build public trust and reduce the spread of misinformation. When people have a clearer idea of how scientists reach conclusions, they are less likely to misinterpret or oversimplify scientific results, which may support more informed decisions and engagement with science.
1. transparency noun 透明度；公开透明
2. build public trust 建立公众信任
3. prevent misinformation 防止错误信息传播
4. reach conclusions 得出结论
5. misinterpret verb 误解；曲解
6. oversimplify scientific results 过度简化科学结果